The Manchester Arena Incident: Part Six
Lawfare
To download or share this video, visit this link: https://odysee.com/@Pighooey:7/lawfare:6
Disclaimer: Everything in this article is stated as honestly held opinion, not an assertion of fact.
Lawfare
In this episode I pause and take stock. Nearly 8 years have passed since the night of the Manchester Arena Incident, and only now is Establishment’s game being revealed through the Hibbert v Hall trial. This video examines some of the implications of the UK High Court judgement for anyone who is interested in uncovering State Fabricated Terror Events.
Richard D. Hall, (Outside the High Court) 8/11/2024.
"There are few citizens, if any, who have researched and investigated the Manchester Arena incident more than I have. In my years of investigation I did not find any evidence to show that a real bomb was used. But I did find video and photographic evidence which shows, beyond doubt, that there was no bomb. This court has refused consistently and repeatedly to examine fully any primary evidence from the Manchester incident, which I put forward in my defence. It has also refused my applications to obtain further evidence, which we know exists, and would be easy for a court to obtain. I contend, therefore, that this was not a fair trial. I would also like to thank my barrister Mr Paul Oakley, who is a brilliant barrister. Thankyou."
And whether, like me, you can’t fault a single word of Richard D Hall’s post-trial statement, or whether you vehemently dispute it – we are all now well and truly confined to the same boat.
Links to Critiqued Material
As I explain at the end of my video, I have decided to set up a dedicated page on this Substack account, and another one on my own website http://www.pighooey.co.uk to build up a page of useful links and documents about the Manchester Arena Incident. It will take me a while to set this up - it’s boring, time consuming work, but I do think it’s necessary. In the meantime, here are the links to the documents I use in this video.
The Manchester Attack: An Independent Investigation book by Iain Davis
Hibbert v Hall Press Summary - Judiciary.uk
Iain Davis commentary on UK Column
Manchester Arena Inquiry Reports
Estimating the cost of Terrorist Attacks - Home Office Report
The systematic removal of lawful material is, as you rightly say, highly suspicious.
It is also annoying, given how painstakingly I had set up links to the precise places in videos from the Inquiry YouTube channel, which is now defunct.
It is obvious that they have something to hide.
Technically, the Inquiry videos and transcripts are still available, but, as you say, they have made them almost impossible to find.
Thank you for endeavouring to archive that material and to make it publicly accessible. That is a really important public service - the kind that a £31.6 million Public Inquiry should have been able to accomplish.
You’re setting a good example and obviously working hard , thank you, it’s greatly appreciated, keep it up, bless you.