The Manchester Arena Incident: Part Five
The Jigsaw Puzzle
To download or share this video, visit this link: youtube.com
Disclaimer: Everything in this article is stated as honestly held opinion, not an assertion of fact.
Checking the Evidence
In this episode, I compare the testimony of five witnesses testifying under oath, to the primary evidence that is hiding in plain sight in the public domain.
The witnesses I have chosen are…
Janet Senior (from 0-20mins)
Josie Howarth (20-29mins)
Darah Burke (29-39mins)
Andrea Bradbury (39-1hr 5 mins)
Claire Booth (1hr 5 mins – 1hr 35mins)
The most important witness is Claire Booth, so if you’re pressed for time, I recommend watching that one. For a bit of light relief, I recommend Andrea Bradbury.
Links to Critiqued Material
MAI Day 89: 19th April 2021 (Janet Senior, Josie Howarth)
MAI Day 89: 19th April 2021 (Andrea Bradbury)
MAI Day 85: 12th April 2021 (Darah Burke)
MAI Day 138: 22nd July 2021 (Claire Booth)
Mail Online (video of staircase rescue)
Getty Images (picture of 3 women on Victoria Station Concourse)
Manchester Arena Inquiry: Report 2
Laurel and Hardy Me and My Pal
A forensic cock-up
I have spent more time than is good for me researching and compiling this episode. It seems that whenever I turn over a stone to see what lurks underneath, a bucket-load of ugly grubs come crawling out. And I can’t ignore them, they all have their place.
One of the questions I’ve been asking myself is… “why have so many obvious clues been left lying around for anyone to pick up?” The whole lot of them could’ve been swept away by now, put beyond our reach, and yet they are still out there to find by anyone who has an atom of curiosity.
I’ve long since stopped trying to second guess their silly game-plan because there are so many hypotheticals, but I’m starting to wonder if “Cock-up and Cover-up” has more mileage than I’d previously considered. For instance, all of the CCTV images presented at the Saunders Inquiry display the time of the still image as “GMT”, but on 22nd May it was British Summer Time (BST) which is GMT plus 1 hour. How could a team of Forensic Investigators make such a rookie error? And yet they did.
This may be easy for you to rectify,
but why does anyone assume the footage of the 'phantom explosions aftermath' was taken on the night alleged or times claimed?
All, some, or (less likely?) NONE of the footage may be from the 'event' but how can that be confirmed BEYOND DOUBT?
All CCTV & even metadata Time stamps CAN be manipulated.
If you go to (or have access to) Ireland & watch their news, they show you CCTV footage of crimes in crystal clear 4K quality. Yet almost ALL UK CCTV images shown IN THE MEDIA are 360p smugged grot. I work with CCTV sometimes & the quality now is usually superb, & this should be notably so for public HUBS & TRANSPORT TERMINALS etc.
Thoroughly engrossing analysis.
The clues to this puzzle are indeed strewn everywhere you care to look.
Some of the witness descriptions of the moment the bang occurred are priceless:
"I thought he we go, it's a bomb."
She might've added, "Anyway, I barely had time to finish me coffee before it hit me."
How much were they paid for this farce?
The Laurel and Hardy clips were well chosen, too, and provided a nice ironic touch.